7. Synthèse des résultats#
Type de valeur \((m)\) |
Référence |
|
|
\({U}_{B}\) |
|||
\({V}_{B}\) |
|||
\({W}_{B}\) |
–1.721655 10–6 |
< 0.1% |
< 0.1% |
\({U}_{C}\) |
x |
||
\({V}_{C}\) |
|||
\({W}_{C}\) |
–1.707308 10–6 |
< 0.1% |
0.1% |
\({U}_{D}\) |
–1.721655 10–7 |
< 0.1% |
–2.2% |
\({V}_{D}\) |
|||
\({W}_{D}\) |
1.434713 10–8 |
–0.2% |
–15.5% |
\({U}_{E}\) |
|||
\({V}_{E}\) |
|||
\({W}_{E}\) |
–1.291241 10–6 |
< 0.1% |
< 0.1% |
\((\mathrm{Pa})\) |
|||
\(A\) |
2.29554 105 |
< 0.1% |
–5.3% |
\(E\) |
1.14777 105 |
< 0.1% |
< 0.1% |
Modélisation : |
A ( HEXA20 découpage : 3 en \(Z\) , 2 en \(X\) et \(Y\) ) |
B ( HEXA8 découpage : 12 en \(Z\) , 8 en \(X\) et \(Y\) ) |
La modélisation en HEXA8 nécessiterait un maillage beaucoup plus fin.