6. Résultats de la modélisation B

6.1. Valeurs testées

Identification	Référence	Test	Tolérance
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{p}\) \(t=24s\)	0	ANALYTIQUE	1.0E-6 (absolu)
\(\chi\) \(t=24s\)	0	ANALYTIQUE	1.0E-6 (absolu)
\({\sigma}_{zz}^{}\) \(t=24s\)	106	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{}\) \(t=24s\)	–3.84 10-3	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{th}}\) \(t=24s\)	-0.005640	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{meca}}\) \(t=24s\)	0.018	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{plas}}\) \(t=24s\)	0	ANALYTIQUE	1.0E-6 (absolu)
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{p}\) \(t=26s\)	0.037217	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\(\chi\) \(t=26s\)	1	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\sigma}_{zz}^{}\) \(t=26s\)	106	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{}\) \(t=26s\)	0.051507	ANALYTIQUE	1.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{th}}\) \(t=26s\)	-0.004884	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{meca}}\) \(t=26s\)	0.05639	ANALYTIQUE	1.0%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{plas}}\) \(t=26s\)	0.05444	ANALYTIQUE	1.0%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{p}\) \(t=40s\)	0.062523	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\(\chi\) \(t=40s\)	1	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\sigma}_{zz}^{}\) \(t=40s\)	106	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{}\) \(t=40s\)	0.10197	ANALYTIQUE	1.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{th}}\) \(t=40s\)	-0.003546	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{meca}}\) \(t=40s\)	0.01055	ANALYTIQUE	1.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{plas}}\) \(t=40s\)	0.01025	ANALYTIQUE	1.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{p}\) \(t=90s\)	0.0741	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\(\chi\) \(t=90s\)	1	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\sigma}_{zz}^{}\) \(t=90s\)	106	ANALYTIQUE	0.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{}\) \(t=90s\)	0.10984	ANALYTIQUE	1.0%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{th}}\) \(t=90s\)	-0.01098	ANALYTIQUE	0.6%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{meca}}\) \(t=90s\)	0.012082	ANALYTIQUE	1.1%
\({\epsilon}_{zz}^{\mathit{plas}}\) \(t=90s\)	0.011407	ANALYTIQUE	1.1%

6.2. Remarques

Dans cette modélisation, on prend en compte le terme dû à la plasticité de transformation:

\({\dot{\epsilon}}^{\mathit{pt}}(T,Z)\ne 0\) lorsque \(\dot{Z}\mathrm{\ne }0\)