All news

News

All forums

Forum

  • Code_Aster usage 27/09/2023 | by Irvise
    Glad to hear it was not the element type. Have you tried the "CONTINUOUS"/STANDARD contact model? It should be capable of handling some more complex cases when compared to DISCRETE (not always!)....
    Know more
  • Code_Aster usage 27/09/2023 | by Irvise
    Adding to what Jean-Pierre said, I have also been recommended the use of reduced integration when using quadratic elements. These are the "*_SI" models (so AXIS_SI, 3D_SI, etc) when building a...
    Know more
  • Code_Aster usage 27/09/2023 | by Jules DANZEL
    Hi Fer, I already tried linear elements. The problem is they are not precise enough (my result is too far from what i can get in my reference case with Abaqus). I just tried bi-quads (9-Quad),...
    Know more
  • Code_Aster usage 27/09/2023 | by jeanpierreaubry
    [quote=stefano89]Thanks Jean Pierre, The strange plot results disappear if I project COQUE3D stress results on a linear mesh. Stefanoquote] in the old days it was recommended to do that way and i...
    Know more
  • Code_Aster usage 27/09/2023 | by stefano89
    Thanks Jean Pierre, I confirm that with that: the mesh have not plane element. Anyway: 1) Von mises stress results with DST element have been verified with Nastran code, that give the same...
    Know more
pronet

ProNet

Spread and acknowledge benefits of Code_Aster Open source and Salome-Meca
Newsletter
Read previous newsletters