Atom topic feed | site map | contact | login | Protection des données personnelles | Powered by FluxBB | réalisation artaban
You are not logged in.
Hello
I'm trying to use the new LAC contact algorithm to use quadratic tetrahedrons (generated by Salome-Meca).
The simple calculation (two block pressed against each other) converges but the stresses on the contact surface don't look good: only a few high stress sectors thus the leopard skin (see picture in the attachment).
Could it be because of nodes close to each other from the master and slave meshes?
I also ran into oscillations during the calculation trials. These could be avoided by altering the mesh finesse.
I'm thankful for any advice to tune the contact settings for the quadratic elements.
Merci
Larry
Offline
picture
Offline
For anyone struggling with the same problem:
I was able to use the CONTINUE contact method (without LAC) with the quadratic tetrahedrons by creating a linear submesh with the slave faces of each contact pair (one needs to merge the double edges of the resulting lin-quad mesh).
Not sure if the results of such a simulation can be trusted... the linear elements are too stiff.
Offline
Hi,
there should not be any stiffness issues as the surface elements don't carry any stiffness anyways.
The only problem is the resolution of the contact curvature which obviously isn't as accurate any more.
Best,
Richard
Richard Szoeke-Schuller
Product Management
www.simscale.com
We are hiring! https://www.simscale.com/jobs/
Offline
For anyone struggling with the same problem:
I was able to use the CONTINUE contact method (without LAC) with the quadratic tetrahedrons by creating a linear submesh with the slave faces of each contact pair (one needs to merge the double edges of the resulting lin-quad mesh).
Not sure if the results of such a simulation can be trusted... the linear elements are too stiff.
Hi, how do you define the linear submesh in Smesh/Code Aster for contact analysis? Which kind of element do you use?
Kindly regards
Markus
Offline