Atom topic feed | site map | contact | login | Protection des données personnelles | Powered by FluxBB | réalisation artaban
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hello,
I've observed an unexpected heat shock in my transient thermal analysis .
Initial temperature of two solids: 30 、10
When time is less than 50 senconds, the max temperature is bigger than 30.
I have tried to use 3D_DIAG modelisation, but heat shock still exist.
I simulate the model with SolidWorks and I get a correct result without heat shock .
Salome result
SolidWorks result
Last edited by mu (2021-12-10 08:17:50)
Offline
Hi, for thermal shock applications it is recommended to use 3D_DIAG elements, as its known that full integration elements have the tendency to cause numerical oscillations in the temoerature.
See for ecxample in the training materials here Slide 8:
https /www.code-aster.org/V2/UPLOAD/DOC/Formations/06-thermal_analysis.pdf
Best,
Richard
Richard Szoeke-Schuller
Product Management
www.simscale.com
We are hiring! https://www.simscale.com/jobs/
Offline
SolidWorks result
Offline
Hi, Richard
I have tried to use 3D_DIAG, but heat shock still exist.
Hi, for thermal shock applications it is recommended to use 3D_DIAG elements, as its known that full integration elements have the tendency to cause numerical oscillations in the temoerature.
See for ecxample in the training materials here Slide 8:
https/www.code-aster.org/V2/UPLOAD/DOC/Formations/06-thermal_analysis.pdf
Best,
Richard
Offline
Ok, t
hen you can try with a smaller time step or fully implicit time integration (theta=1, default is 0.57).
Best,
Richard
Richard Szoeke-Schuller
Product Management
www.simscale.com
We are hiring! https://www.simscale.com/jobs/
Offline
Have you already tested a modelling without using LIAISON_MAIL?
I mean you have only one "real" solid and two zones of solid elements...
Offline
Hi, Richard
Thanks for your help that solved my problem!
my solution:
theta: 0.65+ , timestep 0.5s-
Ok, t
hen you can try with a smaller time step or fully implicit time integration (theta=1, default is 0.57).Best,
Richard
Offline
Yes, I did.
Just like you said, LIAISON is not necessary, but it is not the problem.
Thank you all the same.
Have you already tested a modelling without using LIAISON_MAIL?
I mean you have only one "real" solid and two zones of solid elements...
Offline
Pages: 1