Welcome to the forums. Please post in English or French.

You are not logged in.

#1 2021-11-09 21:09:21

mihe
Member
From: ENGCALengineeringcalculations
Registered: 2008-04-08
Posts: 256

Comparison SM2019 vs SM2021 - odd contact results

Hi, I ran the same contact analysis with Salome Meca 2019 and 2021. See attached picture and files
-Why are the SM2021 contact results with HEXA27 elements so spotted?

Some other points:
-While debugging mistakes in the .comm file I notice that very few errors are reported to the .mess file with SM2021.
-With SM2021, concepts are not presented by their names but by some id number. For example in the .resu file the RESU concept R1 = STAT_NON_LINE.... is denoted 00000011.
-SM2021 include CA version 15.4. On the down load page only CA 14.4 can be downloaded (stable version). -Is it possible to down load also CA 15.4? -where?

-Is anybody else experiencing these points with SM2021?
BR/Micke


Attachments:
Picture3.jpg, Size: 934.27 KiB, Downloads: 90

Salome Meca 2019 on Ubuntu 18

Offline

#2 2021-11-09 21:10:21

mihe
Member
From: ENGCALengineeringcalculations
Registered: 2008-04-08
Posts: 256

Re: Comparison SM2019 vs SM2021 - odd contact results

The files/Micke


Attachments:
SM2019-2021-HEXA27.zip, Size: 65.7 KiB, Downloads: 47

Salome Meca 2019 on Ubuntu 18

Offline

#3 2021-11-09 21:41:26

hberro
Member
From: Palaiseau, France
Registered: 2011-07-05
Posts: 95

Re: Comparison SM2019 vs SM2021 - odd contact results

Hello,

Regarding the naming, this is normal in v15 which is fully "pythonic" which means that concepts are real python variable and thus no more limit is present for the naming.

The code generates a concept name automatically and this is what you see in the messages file.

As for the real problem encountered, this requires indeed further investigation.

Offline