Welcome to the forums. Please post in English or French.

You are not logged in.

#1 2021-06-09 18:59:22

mihe
Member
From: ENGCALengineeringcalculations
Registered: 2008-04-08
Posts: 228

Contact CONTINUE with SANS_GROUP_NO between slave surfaces

I tried to use SANS_GROUP_NO between slave surfaces that share a common border. But the SANS_GROUP_NO made no difference.

The documentation U4.44.11 section 3.1.3 says "These operands make it possible to exclude from the nodes of surfaces slaves, operation which is recommended when the latter are subjected to boundary conditions in the expected direction of the contact (embedding for example)."

-So this may indicate that SANS_GROUP_NO only can exclude nodes that are in conflict with a boundary condition. Hence not nodes that are in conflict (included in) with another slave surface.  -Can someone confirm this? -If so, would it not be a useful feature if this option could also be used to exclude nodes involved on more slave surfaces?

BR/Micke


Salome Meca 2019 on Ubuntu 18

Offline

#2 2021-06-11 05:51:34

konyaro
Member
From: Genève
Registered: 2016-04-02
Posts: 262

Re: Contact CONTINUE with SANS_GROUP_NO between slave surfaces

Hello Micke,
I asked the same question a few years ago but I guess it hasn't been improved yet:
https://code-aster.org/forum2/viewtopic … 704#p50704

Konyaro


失敗は成功のもと (L'échec est la base de la réussite)

Offline

#3 2021-06-11 06:11:04

mf
Member
Registered: 2019-06-18
Posts: 210

Re: Contact CONTINUE with SANS_GROUP_NO between slave surfaces

Hello,

I also can confirm this behaviour, I had a simulation a few days ago where 2 slave surfaces were next to each other. I had to make an additional partition, that introduced a small gap between the two. SANS_GROUP_NO did not work.

Yes, it would be useful,

Mario.

Last edited by mf (2021-06-11 06:17:42)

Offline