Atom topic feed | site map | contact | login | Protection des données personnelles | Powered by FluxBB | réalisation artaban
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi
So I'm continue analyzing the shell that I discussed in the post: Distribute a load to a set of nodes (Sorry I cannot post links).
Now I'm trying to do a buckling analysis wich I do with these steps:
# Resolution
# ----------
res1=MECA_STATIQUE( MODELE=modl,
CHAM_MATER=chmat,
CARA_ELEM=cara,
EXCIT=(
_F( CHARGE = rdisp),
_F( CHARGE = clim),
_F( CHARGE = press),
_F( CHARGE = pload),),
OPTION = 'SIEF_ELGA',
);
# Stress field to calculate the geometric stiffnes matrix
# -------------------------------------------------------
stressg = CREA_CHAMP (
RESULTAT = res1,
OPERATION = 'EXTR',
TYPE_CHAM = 'ELGA_SIEF_R',
NOM_CHAM = 'SIEF_ELGA',
TYPE_MAXI = 'MINI',
TYPE_RESU = 'VALE'
)
# Elementary matrices and Assembly
# ---------------------------
matg = CALC_MATR_ELEM (OPTION = 'RIGI_GEOM',
MODELE = modl,
CARA_ELEM = cara,
SIEF_ELGA = stressg,)
matm = CALC_MATR_ELEM (OPTION = 'RIGI_MECA',
MODELE = modl,
CHAM_MATER = chmat,
CARA_ELEM = cara,
CHARGE = (rdisp, clim,
#press, pload,
),)
nuddl = NUME_DDL (MATR_RIGI = matm,)
masrig = ASSE_MATRICE (MATR_ELEM = matg,
NUME_DDL = nuddl,)
masrim = ASSE_MATRICE (MATR_ELEM = matm,
NUME_DDL = nuddl,)
# Calculate the modes
# -------------------
modp1 = CALC_MODES (MATR_RIGI_GEOM = masrig,
OPTION = 'PLUS_PETITE',
MATR_RIGI = masrim,
SOLVEUR_MODAL =
_F(
METHODE='SORENSEN'
),
TYPE_RESU = 'MODE_FLAMB',
CALC_CHAR_CRIT = _F(
NMAX_CHAR_CRIT = 6,
),
)
I get very low values for the critical load
numéro charge critique norme d'erreur
1 2.37993E-02 1.35091E-10
2 2.37993E-02 1.43175E-10
3 2.43823E-02 1.52333E-10
4 2.43823E-02 1.21724E-10
5 2.64413E-02 9.63314E-11
6 2.64413E-02 1.12501E-10
and the modes are global
As in the other post I'm comparing the results with the ones I get using abaqus, where I get much bigger critical load:
MODE NO EIGENVALUE
1 0.51168
2 0.53620
3 0.54860
4 0.55567
5 0.56876
6 0.57455
and the modes are local which correspond to the location of maximun compression values, that makes more sense than the
global modes:
The rest of results (displacements, stresses...) of the linear static analysis, I get the same values in code_aster and abaqus.
What can I do to solve this?
I attach the .comm and .med file.
Thanks.
Last edited by Msegade (2017-05-31 10:47:04)
Offline
hello
what is the variable load upon which buckling is to be calculated
this is not very clear in your example
jeean pierre aubry
consider reading my book
freely available here https://framabook.org/beginning-with-code_aster/
Offline
hello
what is the variable load upon which buckling is to be calculated
this is not very clear in your examplejeean pierre aubry
Are both the "pload" and "press" loads.
Offline
do you mean they vary linealy TOGETHER at the same rate ?
consider reading my book
freely available here https://framabook.org/beginning-with-code_aster/
Offline
do you mean they vary linealy TOGETHER at the same rate ?
Yes, later I would want to make another analysis where I just vary one of the loads while remaining the other costant,
but the results I got in abaqus are with both loads varying linealy together at the same rate.
Offline
i get the frist critical at 0.5465 with the shape shown attached
consider reading my book
freely available here https://framabook.org/beginning-with-code_aster/
Offline
i get the frist critical at 0.5465 with the shape shown attached
That's what I was looking for!
Can you please share the .comm file?
Offline
here it is
as can see your first trial was quite out
for buckling as for may other problems code_aster looks very verbose
but can be easily fine tuned once the first .comm file has been written
consider reading my book
freely available here https://framabook.org/beginning-with-code_aster/
Offline
Thanks! Now I got it working.
Is there any reason why 'PLUS_PETITE' is not working?
If I use the same .comm file and I replace
modp1=CALC_MODES(
TYPE_RESU='MODE_FLAMB',
OPTION='BANDE',
STOP_BANDE_VIDE='OUI',
MATR_RIGI=mascomb,
MATR_RIGI_GEOM=masrigv,
CALC_CHAR_CRIT=_F(
CHAR_CRIT=(mini,maxi,),
),
VERI_MODE=_F(
STOP_ERREUR='NON',
),
);
with
modp1=CALC_MODES(
TYPE_RESU='MODE_FLAMB',
#OPTION='BANDE',
OPTION = 'PLUS_PETITE',
STOP_BANDE_VIDE='OUI',
MATR_RIGI=mascomb,
MATR_RIGI_GEOM=masrigv,
CALC_CHAR_CRIT=_F(
#CHAR_CRIT=(mini,maxi,),
NMAX_CHAR_CRIT = 6,
),
VERI_MODE=_F(
STOP_ERREUR='NON',
),
);
I get bad results.
Offline
Is there any reason why 'PLUS_PETITE' is not working?
this is probably explained somewhere in the doc
without reading it
my first answer is that
as the critical buckling load factor may take negative value
it will always be possible to find a value close to "minus infinity"
which will probably be meaningless
consider reading my book
freely available here https://framabook.org/beginning-with-code_aster/
Offline
Pages: 1