site map | contact | login | Protection des données personnelles | Powered by FluxBB | réalisation artaban
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hello Dr. Ackva,
of course, the square elements are preferable. I just wanted to understand with the linear elements the difference in approach Abaqus/Code_aster. As I said, in Abaqus the under-integration is set as default for linear quadrilateral elements (2D) and also for the linear hexahedra. In addition, any control parameters are still used. The intention is to get a grip on locking and hourglass effects. I think we should end the discussion with this and I thank you expressly for your hints.
Best regards,
Hansbau52
Hello Dr. Ackva,
sorry, of course I described that quite badly. Regardless of the type of model (3D/shell), I have normal stresses in the cross-section of a clamped beam, which result quite generally from bending and tension/compression (normal in the sense of orthogonal to the section surface). In my simple model, the x-direction is the longitudinal axis of the beam and only bending normal stresses occur.
In the meantime I have learned a little.
In the attachment you will find a result picture. On the left the solid geometry and on the right the shell. The shell stresses are shown on the top side and on the bottom side. I have shifted the geometries accordingly by half the thickness. But I am not yet satisfied with this, because I want a uniform scale without a jump at the transition. I thought I might have to create a new result vector for this, which contains e.g. only SIXX ???
Best regards,
Hansbau52
Hello Dr. Ackva,
thank you very much for your answer. I had of course set the cross-contraction to zero and also used the connection with COQUE-MASSIF without overlap. My question was about the reduced integration for the linear 3D elements. In Abaqus it is standard and leads to relatively good results. With Code_aster I did not notice any difference. Can you please tell me something about this?
Best regards,
Hansbau52
Hi community,
I want to create a vector that contains only the normal stress SIXX in a simple model. But it should be composed of SIXX from a 3D area and a DKT area (shell top side) of the model. Can someone please help me how to describe this.
Regards,
Hansbau52
Hello together
I have been working in an engineering office for technical calculations and simulation for many years. I have a lot of experience with Abaqus and have recently started to work with Code_aster. I am particularly interested in coupled models (3D, shell, beam) because they are common in practical modelling.
Greetings from Germany
Hansbau52
Hy community,
My test model (see attached picture) with linear elements (3D/DKT) produces a deformation of 1.77 mm.
There is no difference between 3D and 3D-SI. The same calculation with Abaqus gives a displacement of 1.79 mm with C3D8/S4 elements. If I replace C3D8 with C3D8R (reduced integration), I obtain a displacement of 2.64 mm.
I expect a result around 2.5 mm ( beam, analytically FL³/3EI). I also obtain this with a pure shell model.
Have I missed something (3D versus 3D-SI)?
Best Regards,
Hansbau52
Hi community,
I am using a mixed 3D/shell model (linear) for a simple test example (cantilever beam). I want to visualise the results (displacements, stresses) in ParaViS. Do I have to create new fields in code_aster or can I organise the visualisation exclusively in ParaViS? What do I have to pay attention to?
Regards,
Pages: 1