Welcome to the forums. Please post in English or French.

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: Salome-Meca installation » Salome-Meca on arm64 based system » 2023-05-12 09:50:50

This is not planned for the moment.

Building code_aster on arm64 is not possible for the moment

#2 Re: Code_Aster installation » Install code_aster from 15.4 version » 2023-05-09 08:20:39

see https: //gitlab.com/codeaster-opensource-documentation/opensource-installation-development

#3 Re: Code_Aster usage » Solve with GPU instead of CPU? » 2023-03-27 12:06:20

In the salome_meca container, you have to compile yourself the MPI version of code_aster then link it to aster_study

#4 Re: Code_Aster usage » What are MEFLTR elements? » 2023-03-24 08:02:51

This an internal name. Never use the name of the finite element but only the modelization. Here, 2D_FLUIDE

#6 Re: Code_Aster usage » [Solved]Definition of python functions including code_aster operations » 2023-02-06 09:21:24

This solution is ok for code_aster < 15.3. After that, your fonction should work directly (and the syntax of MACRO has complety changed)

#7 Re: Code_Aster usage » Modelisation 3D_HM - Element Types HEXA-TETRA » 2023-01-12 10:10:42

I suppose that works for quadratique cells.

Try and see.

#8 Re: Code_Aster usage » Unknown operator: LIAISON_SOLIDE_SPH » 2023-01-05 08:32:48

The most probable is that ChatGPT gives non-sense results.

#9 Re: Code_Aster usage » MECA_STATIQUE and 'reuse' keyword » 2022-12-22 15:31:00

MECA_STATIQUE has 3 different version (fortran : v14, c++ : v15, python: v16)

In v15, I advise you to use RESULTAT in place of reuse in the command file
In v16.3< : You can fix as you do it
In >v16.3: It is fixed and works as in v14

There was no test to verify this configuration before

#10 Re: Code_Aster usage » MECA_STATIQUE and 'reuse' keyword » 2022-12-22 15:01:38

Ok this is a bug.

I fix it in the current version and I have updated the doc.

#11 Re: Code_Aster usage » MECA_STATIQUE and 'reuse' keyword » 2022-12-22 09:42:28

The doc is not up to date.

Have you a complete output to be sure that it is work as I am expected ?

#12 Re: Code_Aster installation » Prerequisites for Code_Aster stand-alone stable version [SOLVED] » 2022-12-01 20:22:46

from 15.3.17 until 15.8 : salome_meca-lgpl-2020.0.1-7-20210601-scibian-9

#13 Re: Code_Aster installation » Prerequisites for Code_Aster stand-alone stable version [SOLVED] » 2022-12-01 16:53:41

They do not exist for version 15. The first one for which the new procedure is given is 16.2.4 (20220817).

From 15.3.17, this is possible with the appropriate singularity container

#14 Re: Code_Aster usage » [SOLVED]Control of the time increments in a THER_NON_LINE analysis » 2022-10-25 09:09:37

This is planned in the HPC-roadmap (in the two next years probably)

#15 Re: Code_Aster usage » [SOLVED]Control of the time increments in a THER_NON_LINE analysis » 2022-10-24 15:27:05

This is not possible in THER_NON_LINE. You have to define manually your time discretization

#16 Re: Code_Aster usage » Execution time of CALC_CHAMP » 2022-10-21 12:29:27

Which version do tou use ?

There is a known bug for ELGE_ELNO (memory leak) not yet solved

#17 Re: Code_Aster usage » Deformation GREEN_LAGRANGE » 2022-10-18 15:33:42

C'est un problème de doc. Une modif en v16 a été mise en v15. Il faut utilser GROT_GDEP en v15

#18 Re: Code_Aster development » Is CA still being developed? » 2022-09-08 10:28:07

run_testcase from src directory and run_aster (in install/bin) from where you want (before source the file profile.sh in install/share_aster)

#19 Re: Salome-Meca installation » Building MPI version in salome_meca 2021.1.0-2-20220817 fails » 2022-09-08 10:23:01

the stable version is 15.6 now on gitlab

You can build with the container but with appropriate version

https: //gitlab.com/codeaster-opensource-documentation/opensource-installation-development/-/blob/main/devel/changelog.md

#20 Re: Code_Aster development » Is CA still being developed? » 2022-09-08 08:40:28

Have you verified that your installation is ok with lauching all verification test cases with run_testcases ?

You can use run_aster instead to have more informations

#21 Re: Salome-Meca installation » Building MPI version in salome_meca 2021.1.0-2-20220817 fails » 2022-09-08 08:37:46

The only difference between containter salome_meca_2021.1.0-***** is the prerequisities for the unstable version of code_aster and nothing change for salome_meca.

They are given to build unstable version and not stable version 15.*. Moreover, they work a specific interval of unstavle version

If you don't plan to use  unstable version, this is not necessecary to change salome_meca container.

Use git repository instead source forge

#22 Re: Code_Aster development » Is CA still being developed? » 2022-09-07 10:39:08

Hello,

Is there an outpout ? .mess ? .o ? or something like that ?

#23 Re: Code_Aster development » Is CA still being developed? » 2022-08-30 17:09:50

The mpi installation is presented because it is always harder

For sequential version, discard installation of MPI librairies and at the end to configure prerequisities, set
ARCH=gcc-openblas-seq for exemple. seq is for sequential version (it is mentionned at the end)

For aster, use waf_std instead of waf (waf=waf_mpi now)

#24 Re: Code_Aster usage » [SOLVED] Old macros fail in code_aster 15.6 » 2022-08-30 15:28:49

Maybe the macro ASSEMBLAGE is a good choice

Read the following doc to:
https hmm/codeaster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/devguide/recommendations.html?highlight=macro#macro-commands

#25 Re: Code_Aster usage » [SOLVED] Old macros fail in code_aster 15.6 » 2022-08-30 13:52:05

There is no backward compatibility since too many things have changes.

Your links is a good starting point. I advise you to see macro inside code_aster that have converted